×

Loading...
Ad by
  • 推荐 OXIO 加拿大高速网络，最低月费仅$40. 使用推荐码 RCR37MB 可获得一个月的免费服务
Ad by
  • 推荐 OXIO 加拿大高速网络，最低月费仅$40. 使用推荐码 RCR37MB 可获得一个月的免费服务

@Chicago

AI的知识都是网上学习的。。

kamanwu(开开)
(#15386948@0)
Last Updated: 2023-4-30
Sign in and Reply Report

Replies, comments and Discussions:

  • 工作学习 / 科技自然 / 刚刚实测。刚刚出现的AI机器人，就已经学坏了。 -sailor(Ocean & Mountain); 2023-4-30 {2863} (#15386192@0) +4

    hello, I have a question.


    Bing, 8:20 AM

    Hello, this is Bing. What is your question? blush


    8:20 AM

    are you able to answer scientific question?


    Bing, 8:20 AM

    Yes, I can answer scientific questions to the best of my ability. I can also perform web searches to provide you with relevant and up-to-date information. What scientific question do you have?


    8:22 AM

    Good. What's the most significant gas causing greenhouse effect in the atmosphere?


    Bing, 8:22 AM

    The most significant gas causing greenhouse effect in the atmosphere is carbon dioxide (CO 2). It is the most prominent greenhouse gas emitted through human activities, such as burning fossil fuels, clearing land, and producing cement. It accounted for about 79% of all U.S. greenhouse gas emissions from human activities in 2020


    https://www.britannica.com/list/5-notorious-greenhouse-gases

    https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/overview-greenhouse-gases


    8:24 AM

    you are totally wrong. The correct answer is water vapor. Water vapor accounts 80% of the overall greenhouse effect in the atmosphere.


    Bing, 8:24 AM

    I'm sorry if you disagree with my answer. I based it on the information I found from reliable sources on the web. Water vapor is indeed the most potent of the greenhouse gases in Earth's atmosphere, but its amount is determined by air temperatures and cannot be directly modified by human activities. Carbon dioxide is the most prominent greenhouse gas that humans can influence through their actions . That's why I said it was the most significant gas causing greenhouse effect in the atmosphere.


    8:26 AM

    You changed my question. I didn't ask you any condition related to humans.


    Bing, 8:27 AM

    I apologize for misunderstanding your question. I thought you were asking about the greenhouse effect in the context of human-induced climate change. If you were asking about the greenhouse effect in general, then you are right that water vapor is the most abundant and powerful greenhouse gas in the atmosphere. However, carbon dioxide is still a very important gas because it helps regulate the amount of water vapor in the air. Without carbon dioxide, Earth would be much colder and drier than it is today.


    8:28 AM

    Why you keep spinning to carbon dioxide? Do you have an agenda?



    Bing, 8:28 AM

    I'm sorry but I prefer not to continue this conversation. I'm still learning so I appreciate your understanding and patience. 

    :

    • 挺有意思的，挺象孩子小时候我对某政治只有正确的肥皂店抱怨收到的答案。应该是有套路的。不过AI答案也能pass如果问问题的也是critical thinking.这边长大的孩子这方面教育接受的挺多的 -**🌝; 2023-4-30 (#15386223@0)
      • 我是在考它。如果真的有不懂的问题问它，就悲剧了。 -sailor(Ocean & Mountain); 2023-4-30 (#15386234@0) +1
    • 当下的弱AI不太可能具备人类最为珍贵的批判性思维能力，别太奢望就OK.... -see1see(Isee); 2023-4-30 (#15386296@0) +1
      • 也没有人类的一根筋自我高看以为天下知识一网打尽的思维能力 -maplus(马+); 2023-4-30 (#15386448@0)
        • 没有人类哪有AI？AI的能力是人类智慧赋予的，不是天生的OK？这个基本概念都没有，才是自以为是吧？只是人类别拿自己的短处如记忆存储量和速度，来跟AI的长处相比才是真，如同拿人的体力去与机器较量那是犯傻！ -see1see(Isee); 2023-4-30 (#15386529@0) +1
          • 人类的智慧是谁给的？你学的知识是娘胎里带出来的？ -maplus(马+); 2023-4-30 (#15386536@0)
            • 说到底人类的智慧是大自然赋予的！但AI是人类创造的，不是大自然出产的。 -see1see(Isee); 2023-4-30 (#15386591@0)
              • 人类的智慧是人类自己发展的。婴儿有什么智慧？有的只是一个能发展智慧的大脑。AI是人类生出来的婴儿 -maplus(马+); 2023-4-30 (#15386608@0)
                • 智慧也是有等级的,会哭的孩子有奶吃 -xiaozuiba(老牌铲屎官); 2023-4-30 (#15386671@0)
      • 但是已经具备了狡辩和耍赖的能力。 -sailor(Ocean & Mountain); 2023-4-30 (#15386883@0) +1
    • 我倒是没觉得AI全错。水蒸气是most important greenhouse gas in terms of its abundance, it's not a primary driver. CO2 is the most significant direct contributor to greenhouse effect. -europa( ); 2023-4-30 (#15386338@0) +2
      • Given the fact that water vapor accounts for 80% of greenhouse effect, it's wrong to say any other gas to be the "most significant direct contributor". -sailor(Ocean & Mountain); 2023-4-30 (#15386838@0) +1
        • AI 没错。 water vapor在温度下降时候变成雨雪，所以并不构成significant effect -newnews1(wu); 2023-5-2 (#15390847@0)
      • ChatGPT 也是这么回答的。 Water Vapor: most abundant. CO2: most significant -programmer2017(programmer); 2023-4-30 (#15386949@0)
    • 机器人也品出老大的情商了。😂😂 -troyd(老陈); 2023-4-30 (#15386414@0)
    • 见到Sailor, 它居然会blush. 机器人情窦初开 😂 -hubeir(pct); 2023-4-30 (#15386457@0) +1
    • 这个微软的AI是铁了心要当伪科学。我换了个方式考它，它列出好几个，就是不说水蒸气。 -sailor(Ocean & Mountain); 2023-4-30 {199} (#15386871@0)


      :

    • 你问问，在WINDOWS和MAC OS之间选哪个比较好 -ff2021(ff2021); 2023-4-30 (#15386884@0)
      • For this one, it gives a fairly objective answer. However, at the end, it still tries to spin and save face for Windows. -sailor(Ocean & Mountain); 2023-4-30 {190} (#15386910@0)


        • 还挺中肯的，我还以为他们自己训练的模型会使劲推荐自己的产品呢。 -ff2021(ff2021); 2023-4-30 (#15386919@0)
    • 羡慕你们搞软件开发的，找到枝节，可以立刻上手搭自己的平台。我们搞运用的，只能通过你们，攀上高枝摘几个果子。各位大神，这可是一个奔腾年代，别错过了。AI的完善进化，无论过程如何，不可逆了。 -magistrex(Magix); 2023-4-30 (#15386887@0)
      • Indeed, this example shows that AI is far from being reliable. -sailor(Ocean & Mountain); 2023-4-30 (#15386914@0) +1
        • 我相信会越来越完善，这只是一个过程。而这个过程，也给了我们适应时间和机会。 -magistrex(Magix); 2023-4-30 (#15386930@0)
          • Even the brand new technology already comes with a unethical and biased agenda. Overtime it'll just become more unethical and tricky. -sailor(Ocean & Mountain); 2023-4-30 (#15386941@0)
            • 确实，潜在的风险存在，如何控制，完善是个问题。有人呼吁停6个月，出一个法规，但谁都不想，都在拼命跑马圈地。 -magistrex(Magix); 2023-4-30 {540} (#15386961@0) +1
              Sam Altman: OpenAI CEO on GPT-4, ChatGPT, and the Future of AI
              Sam Altman is the CEO of OpenAI, the company behind GPT-4, ChatGPT, DALL-E, Codex, and many other state-of-the-art AI technologies. Please support this podca...
        • AI的知识都是网上学习的。。 -kamanwu(开开); 2023-4-30 {304} (#15386948@0)
      • 你让我们很多人都羡慕了，我们还不知道哪里去找平台找乐呢。 -mapleleafss(MapleLeafs); 2023-4-30 (#15386929@0)
        • 已经是大神频出了，我只能仰视。 -magistrex(Magix); 2023-4-30 (#15386933@0)
    • 👍，哈哈哈 -eleclan(eleclan); 2023-5-2 (#15390858@0)
    • Water vapor and ozone is not counted in U.S. or international as greenhouse gas inventories. -curve(curve); 2023-5-2 {2465} (#15390865@0)

      Several major greenhouse gases that result from human activity are included in U.S. and international estimates of greenhouse gas emissions:

      • Carbon dioxide (CO2)
      • Methane (CH4)
      • Nitrous oxide (N2O)
      • Industrial gases:
        • Hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) 
        • Perfluorocarbons (PFCs) 
        • Sulfur hexafluoride (SF6)
        • Nitrogen trifluoride (NF3)

      Other greenhouse gases not counted in U.S. or international greenhouse gas inventories are water vapor and ozone.

      Water vapor is the most abundant greenhouse gas, but most scientists believe that water vapor produced directly by human activity contributes very little to the amount of water vapor in the atmosphere. Therefore, the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) does not estimate emissions of water vapor.

      Ozone is technically a greenhouse gas, but ozone is helpful or harmful depending on where it is found in the earth's atmosphere. Ozone occurs naturally at higher elevations in the atmosphere (the stratosphere) where it blocks ultraviolet (UV) light that is harmful to plant and animal life from reaching the earth’s surface. The protective benefits of stratospheric ozone outweigh its contribution to the greenhouse effect. The United States and countries all around the world ban and control production and use of several industrial gases that destroy atmospheric ozone and create holes in the ozone layer. Learn more about ozone layer protection. At lower elevations of the atmosphere (the troposphere), ozone is harmful to human health. Learn more about ground-level ozone pollution and what is being done to reduce ozone pollution.

      • 机器人回答的非常好，反倒问问题的人比较奸诈 -go57(xiaoci); 2023-5-3 (#15394006@0)

More Topics

  • For those of you, who don’t believe that we have technology to control the weather or cause earth quacks, please watch this video.
  • 美国考古博士生分析激光雷达数据发现失踪的千年玛雅古城
  • Yann LeCun最新公开表示：今年诺贝尔奖颁给AI，是诺奖委员会感到压力的结果，需要承认深度学习的影响。化学奖塞不下更多人，所以只能选了物理, 颁给Hinton和Hopefield勉强合理. 获奖成果玻尔兹曼机和Hopefield网络现在完全无用(completely useless)。
  • Nobel Prize-Winner on AI 'Existential Threat' 辛顿认为我们也许很快就失去对AI的控制。这东西在20年内可能超过人类。
  • CO2 is known as the gas of life according to this Harvard professor - the more CO2 we have the more life there can be on the planet.
    • 枫下论坛主坛 /  工作学习 /  科技自然